<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: creationists using nature precedings to pre-publish junk science</title>
	<link>http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2007/08/09/creationists-using-nature-precedings-to-pre-publish-junk-science/</link>
	<description>a gathering place for all the stray thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timo Hannay</title>
		<link>http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2007/08/09/creationists-using-nature-precedings-to-pre-publish-junk-science/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo Hannay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2007/08/09/creationists-using-nature-precedings-to-pre-publish-junk-science/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>To be clear, I'm not the editor (in the case of Nature Precedings, more properly described as 'curator'), I'm the publisher.

&#62;&#62; perhaps I should have made my criticism there, rather than in my personal blog.

Yes, good idea! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, I&#8217;m not the editor (in the case of Nature Precedings, more properly described as &#8216;curator&#8217;), I&#8217;m the publisher.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; perhaps I should have made my criticism there, rather than in my personal blog.</p>
<p>Yes, good idea! <img src='http://www.chesnok.com/daily/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selena</title>
		<link>http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2007/08/09/creationists-using-nature-precedings-to-pre-publish-junk-science/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>selena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2007/08/09/creationists-using-nature-precedings-to-pre-publish-junk-science/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing me to the discussion. 

I see that the &lt;strike&gt;editor&lt;/strike&gt; publisher already replied. I disagree with the response. 

I'm glad that you brought this to the Nature staff's attention - perhaps I should have made my criticism there, rather than in my personal blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing me to the discussion. </p>
<p>I see that the <strike>editor</strike> publisher already replied. I disagree with the response. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that you brought this to the Nature staff&#8217;s attention - perhaps I should have made my criticism there, rather than in my personal blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santosh Patnaik</title>
		<link>http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2007/08/09/creationists-using-nature-precedings-to-pre-publish-junk-science/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Santosh Patnaik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2007/08/09/creationists-using-nature-precedings-to-pre-publish-junk-science/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>This raises questions about how pseudo-science should be defined, and what Nature Precedings's policy should be towards such pseudo-scientific articles that have already been accepted. I have posted about it on the journal's forum -- http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/386</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This raises questions about how pseudo-science should be defined, and what Nature Precedings&#8217;s policy should be towards such pseudo-scientific articles that have already been accepted. I have posted about it on the journal&#8217;s forum &#8212; <a href="http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/386" rel="nofollow">http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/386</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
